|
|
От
|
Skvortsov
|
|
|
К
|
digger
|
|
|
Дата
|
05.11.2021 16:37:24
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Современность; Флот;
|
|
Статья 1997 года:
>>Если подвешивать бомбы, то надо еще уменьшить запас топлива. Поэтому при таком взлете F-35B должен немедленно дозаправиться в воздухе.
>
> Т.е. он не замена Харриеру и другого самолета, который может реально использоваться с носителя без ВПП нет (и не было).
The STOVL Joint Strike Fighter in Support of the 21st Century Marine Corps
Author: Major Ben D. Hancock, United States Marine Corps
The Harrier is most productive on ship when used in the STOVL mode versus being forced to perform a vertical takeoff due to limited deck space. A normal mission involves a short takeoff followed by a vertical landing at the end of the mission when the aircraft has expended its ordnance, burned most of its fuel , and has the thrust-to-weight ratio required for a vertical landing. A Harrier is simply not going to get airborne with any substantial load of fuel and ordnance in a pure vertical takeoff. For every foot of deck roll and knot of wind over the deck, the payload increases substantially. All shipboard combat operations by USMC Harriers in Desert Storm involved a Short Takeoff (STO). Vertical takeoffs are performed on ship only for maintenance checks and airshows. The JSF is going to operate in the same manner off of ships. It could perform a pure vertical takeoff but with a huge resultant penalty in payload.
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1997/Hancock.htm