Небольшой поиск, ключевые слова "Iraq regime", "disappear", "first strikes"
>>где обещанный развал режима после первого удара?
>
>КТО его обещал? Фамилию, дату и цитату в студию!
>>Где цветы на Абрамсах? А да, злые комиссары и заградотряды мешаюи иракцам выражать свои чувства освободителям.
>
>А где сопротивление агрессорам? ;-)))
>>Это серьезное политическое поражение амеров. Кстати, их оккупацию никто признавать не наерен - речь идет о том, чтобы передать все под эгиду ООН, конечно, они не будут свою победу какому-то ООН отдавать, что, разумеется, добавит к ним любви.
>
>Вы живете в какой то другой реальности.
"Beaver said that the current U.S. military strategy is to use massive force to overthrow the Iraqi government while trying to reduce the losses of ordinary Iraqi soldiers and Iraqi civilians. Such discretion, strategists hope, will result in the Iraqi population viewing the U.S. forces as liberators rather than conquerors when they occupy, and later take key roles in administering, the country.
Beaver said that a primary goal is to "neutralize" rather than destroy the Iraqi Army. He says the Pentagon hopes to use its massive force to persuade Iraqi units to either revolt against the regime or to surrender to U.S.-led troops for use as a stabilization force in Iraq after the war. "[U.S. planners] would want the Iraqi forces to mutiny, certainly they would want them to disappear back home and lay down their arms. The army will be needed for a stabilization force. If Iraq is going to be dealt with properly and we are going to have a stabilized country after Saddam Hussein is gone, then there is no doubt at all we need the army in place in order to do that," he said."
