От Грозный Ответить на сообщение
К Грозный Ответить по почте
Дата 16.10.2014 10:30:25 Найти в дереве
Рубрики Спецслужбы; Армия; Локальные конфликты; Версия для печати

И ещё несколько смыслов инсинуированы CNN

1. 5-6 случаев - штатовские снаряды снаряжены химоружием из компонентов, поставленных странами Запада.

2. Ещё случай - от старого химоружия (до 91-го), что как бы опровергает официальную теорию про то, что Ирак производил горы химоружия после 91-го

3. Замять провал разведки - не нашли, что обещали (ЯО, БО) и не подготовили войска к тому, что реально нашли (старое ХО)

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/15/us/iraq-chemical-weapons/

The newspaper suggested several reasons why the U.S. government might have wanted to suppress the chemical weapons finds.

For one, in five of the six cases in which troops were wounded by chemical agents, " the munitions appeared to have been designed in the United States, manufactured in Europe and filled in chemical agent production lines built in Iraq by Western companies," the newspaper reported.

For another, the weapons were old -- made before 1991 -- and therefore did not back up U.S. intelligence that at the time suggested Iraq had an active weapons of mass destruction program.

"In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war's outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find," the Times reported.

===> dic duc fac <===