От Пуденко Сергей Ответить на сообщение
К All Ответить по почте
Дата 12.03.2006 09:07:51 Найти в дереве
Рубрики Прочее; Версия для печати

СРОЧНО В Москву приехали Хардт и Негри, ма бене!

будут выступать в ИФ РАН, мне обещали дать наводку

Надо бы СД им наш подарить,что ли, и если кто по-итальянски
понимэ,откликнитесь!

тут вот итальяно разбомбито мультитудо, маддона миа э порко,ма бене





http://interactive.retesms.com/etica/2004_1/guesteditor.htm
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, 2004, 1

http://www.units.it/etica/2004_1/GUESTEDITOR.htm



The Individual and the Masses Multitude in Spinoza



Riccardo Caporali



Dipartimento di Filosofia

Universita di Bologna







http://interactive.retesms.com/etica/2004_1/2004_1.zip

Introduction

In the variety of methods and topics, the essays gathered here revolve
around the problem of the relationship between unity and multiplicity,
between individuality and collectivity in Spinozsa's thinking. This is a
central and crucial issue, both in its specific political dimension as
well as in its inevitable intersections to which it opens (questo non mi
piace molto, ma e brutto anche in Italiano!) with its more exquisitely
moral and theoretical side in the philosophy of Spinoza. This issue is
confronted addressed, in the first place, in relation to the notion of
, in the perspective of a radically and infinitely mobile and
modifiable immanence, continuously disassembled and reassembled in the
multiplicity of single , according to a conception that uis
ideally connected to Lucrezio's atomistic materialism and the
Macchiavellian concept of , contrasting itself frontally with
other visions, monistic and serial, theological and telelological(?),
both ancient and modern (from Plato and the Stoics to Descartes, from
Hobbes to Hegel). Still in close contact with Machiavelli and his
reflection on political action in the contingency of actual reality, the
unity-multiplicity relationship is revisited in light of the idea of the
e>, which in Spinoza's Political Treatise does not appear to
simply oppose (as does occur, in contrast, in many fifteenth and
sixteenth century European republican-Machiavellian readings) forced and
violent political unification carried out by a , but instead
seems to come into play to replace it ?? giocarsi in sostitutuzione di
esso?, to (connectively?) and relatively (qui non capisco cosa vuol
direquindi lascia cosi e poi preciseremo che non ci e chiaro il
significato) measure every process of aggregation and emancipation: even
tyranny, in this way, becomes an expression not of the individual and
his power but of the collective - both purely albeit/although (quale e
meglio?), in a specific case, an expression of one of his weaknesses
more than his strength. It is tThis is a perspective according to which
the Machiavelli's extremely understanding becomes the
, comprehension of the action and interaction of the
whole of individuals comprising a State: the understanding, in other
words, beforehand becomes political paradigm conjugation of the third
Spinozian type of knowledge, the highest and most adequate, which
intuitively proceeds from the universal towards the specific. In partial
continuity with this approach, the third essay saggio excludes rules out
the possibility that one of the traditional and most consolidated
enunciations of may be attributed to Spinoza's political
philosophy one of the traditional and most consolidated scannings of
, since in this the classical roles of the tolerant (the one,
the sovereign, able to coerce and command) and the tolerated (the many,
the governed, in whom greater or lesser is placed, in the
last instance, the formal codification, the consistency and essence of
imperium) are reversed. Intended, Nnot by chance, to conclude the
discussion, the fourth paper/essay actually in reality he completely
reopens it the fourth contribution: a master of Spinozian studies - to
whom all, - even the three authors who preceded him, - owe much, -
through due to an unrelenting/pressing imminent analysis, which calls
into question the effective significance of the idea of , la
cui valorizzazione egli whose valorization exploitation? he does not
consider (non gia) as the legitimate and credible result of authentic
Spinozian instances, but as the persistence of nineteenth century
suggestions: the continuation of the fascination of of Nietzschian
mysticism of immanence and the lingering tendency, typical of many
Marxist traditions (but far from the real, true Marx), to mortify
individuality.



Structured in this way, thee collectionsylloge (sylloge actually
translates silloge which means a collection, an anthology; the
dictionary says it is a rare word in English; silloge is a "learned"
word in Italian too, what do you think it is better to use?) compendium
can seem unusual. Nevertheless - and just because of this unusualness -
it seems to be endowed with a certain positive emblematicism. First and
foremost on the level of Spinoza's extraordinary intellectual
accomplishment, which even in these limited and minute circumstances
emerges in its rich and unitary complexity, always steadfast in
cataloguing, of which there has so often been the temptation to
abbreviate and simplify, plunging it alternatively into antiquity or
modernity, into idealism or materialism, into determinism or freedom,
into rationalism or mysticism, into individualism or holism. But then -
if one could say - also on a subjective and personal level of
"experience", on the level of friendships and esteem which sustains the
impact of confrontation as well as that of dissension, in the common
consciousness - this is indubitably and authentically Spinozian - that
the illusory self-referencing of is for humans among the
greatest causes of fragility and danger.
(R.C.)














http://interactive.retesms.com/etica/2004_1/morfino.htm

http://interactive.retesms.com/etica/2004_1/homepage.html
Monographica:

INDIVIDUO E MOLTITUDINE IN SPINOZA
The Individual and the Multitude in Spinoza


Guest Editor's Preface (30 K)
Riccardo Caporali
Dipartimento di Filosofia
Universita di Bologna




Vittorio Morfino
Temporalita plurale e contingenza: l'interpretazione spinoziana di
Machiavelli. (313 K)
Universita di Milano-Bicocca

Stefano Visentin
Acutissimus o prudentissimus ? Intorno alla presenza di Machiavelli nel
Trattato politico di Spinoza. (157 K)
Universita di Urbino

Riccardo Caporali
Spinoza e la tolleranza. (176 K)
Dipartimento di Filosofia
Universita di Bologna

Paolo Cristofolini
Spinoza, l'individuo e la concordia. (118 K)
Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa