Пробный шар. США угрожает ядерным ударом России(*)
Расслабуха кругом такая. Россиянский либераст радуется весне, своему просперити, прочие заливают глазки и тоже думают"у нас вечность в запасе". С раззявленными ртами ( как у нас тут АБ в половине постингов) гульба .
"Недолго музыка играла, недолго фРАЕР ТАНЦЕВАЛ"
Серьезные дядьки с серьезнах инстанциях спокойно раскилываю следующие пасьянсы и вкидывают через прессу пробные шары. Может, это первая ласточка.
Вообще, там ниже в обсуждении сомневаются в репутации СТРАТФОР. Я этот сайт смотрел во время операции против Югославии, у них были опреативнй , из надежных источников, анализ, четкая и умная позиция. Вряд ли все это нижеприведенное- блкф. Скрее, первый но крупный пробный шар, ЗА КОТОРЫМ СТОИТ ОЧЕРЕДНАЯ СТАДИЯ В ОПЕРАЦИИ, о которой никому тут неохота, страшно да и недосуг думать. Так все уже развалено, что лучше продолжать"пляски на свалке" и компостировать людишкам остатки мозгов. Так было и сразу после 9\11, когда штаты фактически предъявили путинцам ультиматум. Те десять дней трепыхались и сползли на вес условия - итсорию об этой подоплеке рассказывали там же. Все эти их "аналитические"и координационные структуры при кризисе тоже ни на что не способны. Они способны только сливать воду. Крмизисное управление - это тоже надо уметь, обладать запасом структур и мощностей. Их нет и не будет, поэтому - сливайте воду.
============
Американский аналитический сайт Стратфор утверждает, что США обвинили Россию в распространении оружия массового поражения. Если Россия откажется выполнить эти требования, США могут нанести удары по российским ядерным объектам.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/650995/posts
==========
"Crisis Looms Between U.S., Russia
STRATFOR | 20 March 2002 | Staff
Posted on 3/21/02 11:31 AM Pacific by Axion
Crisis Looms Between U.S., Russia
20 March 2002
Summary
CIA Director George Tenet recently singled out Russia as a massive contributor to the spread of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Despite the cooperation Moscow has given to Washington's anti-terrorism campaign, the Bush administration is putting the Russian government on notice. A severe crisis between the two sides may now be forming.
Analysis
While speaking to the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee March 19, CIA Director George Tenet singled out Russia as "the first choice of proliferant states seeking the most advanced technology and training" for weapons of mass destruction, Agence France-Presse reported. Tenet added that Russian sales of technology and expertise applicable to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons were "a major source of funds for commercial and defense industries and military research and development."
Tenet's statement -- coming in the wake of a recent Pentagon report naming seven countries, including Russia, as potential nuclear targets -- was a bombshell. It places responsibility for the spread of Russian weapons of mass destruction squarely on the shoulders of the government in Moscow and sets the stage for a coming confrontation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
STRATFOR has previously said that a new doctrine is emerging within the Bush administration that is based on the following logic: Al Qaeda is not dead and is dedicated to further attacks on the United States. It has demonstrated the desire to obtain chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, which represent a threat to millions of American citizens.
The United States must therefore both destroy al Qaeda and eliminate any stockpiles of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons that could find their way into the group's hands. The fact that most of these stockpiles belong to sovereign nations like Syria, Pakistan and Russia complicates the problem for Washington but does not change the Bush administration's policy.
If anything, ending the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) actually takes priority over destroying the al Qaeda network. Terrorist networks can be badly hurt, but it is incredibly difficult to destroy them completely. WMD stockpiles, plus the accompanying facilities and skilled personnel, are finite and are harder to regenerate than a terrorist network.
Now the director of the CIA has named Russia as the key source of WMD proliferation. Tenet stopped just short of explicitly placing the blame on the Russian government, but at the same time, he also did not blame rogue elements in the Russian security services or mafia syndicates. This would have given Putin a certain amount of deniability and raised the potential for Russia to work with the United States -- like it did in the early 1990s -- on decommissioning weapons of mass destruction.
Instead, Tenet delivered a blunt message to Putin: the United States believes that WMD proliferation is official Russian policy. The government in Moscow must either immediately halt this policy or face the consequences.
Gone is any residual U.S. gratitude for Russian cooperation during the early phases of the war in Afghanistan. The Bush administration is maintaining that the threat posed to the United States is so great that any and all other considerations -- including diplomatic niceties -- must take a backseat.
This represents the beginning of a severe crisis between the United States and Russia. Putin must weigh his choices very carefully. If he accepts U.S. demands and subordinates Russian foreign policy to Washington again, he acknowledges that his country has effectively become subservient to the United States. This not only would be a bitter pill to swallow but also would feed nationalist political and military elements within Russia that currently challenge Putin's agenda. The president has managed these groups so far, but a gesture of appeasement on this scale would inflame the passions of even the most pro-Western Russians.
However, if Putin does not accept U.S. demands, he faces the distinct possibility of attacks on Russian weapons facilities and the potential elimination of his country's nuclear capability. Such an outcome could very easily spark a coup in Russia, which Putin would probably not survive. Even if he did manage to stay in power, Putin's plan to rebuild Russia through economic integration with Europe and closer short-term ties to the United States would be destroyed. And in the worst-case -- but still quite likely -- scenario, Russia would respond by launching a nuclear attack on the United States.
We are not yet at the point of crisis. The Bush administration went public in order to put more pressure on Putin, likely after getting few results from private consultations. Putin is in the process of feeling out American resolve. He knows that Washington has the means to carry out its threat; Putin is now trying to figure out if it has the will."
отрывок речи Тенета(диреткора ЦРУ). это всего лишь отрывок, так что то, что он там наговорил - еще неясно
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/senate_select_hearing_03192002.html
По указаной теме, он сказал следующее:
"Russian entities continue to provide other countries with technology and expertise applicable to CW, BW, nuclear, and ballistic and cruise missile projects. Russia appears to be the first choice of proliferant states seeking the most advanced technology and training. These sales are a major source of funds for Russian commercial and defense industries and military R&D.
Russia continues to supply significant assistance on nearly all aspects of Tehran's nuclear program. It is also providing Iran assistance on long-range ballistic missile programs"
========
Обсуждение темы
http://web.referent.ru/nvk/forum/0/co/258562.htm
из обсуждения
==========
Обратите внимание вот на что: на полном серьёзе обсуждается, как после нанесения точечных ядерных ударов Путину будет трудно бороться с возрастанием анти-американских настроений в России, а может быть даже будет путч и его скинут с президентства! Ай-ай-ай!
...
Я просто предполагаю что нынешнее руководство в ответ на угрозу США применить против России ядерное оружие, выполнит все условия поставленные США. Вот и все.
=======
>Russia continues to supply significant assistance on nearly all aspects of Tehran's nuclear program.
даже так?
>It is also providing Iran assistance on long-range ballistic missile programs"
это еще "убедительнее" звучит - интересно факты есть какие-нить?
>Выглядит довольно безобидно и не очень похоже на ультиматум, но СТРАТФОРу видней...
гдеж безобидно когда в одном параграфе обвиняют в нарушении двух важнейших режимов нераспространения ОМУ - НПТ и РКРТ?
...
===========
