|
|
От
|
Александр
|
|
|
К
|
Рустем
|
|
|
Дата
|
08.02.2002 11:29:20
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Тексты;
|
|
Re: Именно, группенфюрер...
>Почему бы и нет? Беседует же Дершивиц со мной. Вы вот подумайте: он готов защищать фашиста в суде.
Да разве только в суде? Когда американская элита обходила фашистов своими заботами? Херсты, десятки тысяч фашистских палачей, принятых на работу в ЦРУ, когда Гитлер обанкротился, да и в наше время:
"We learn more about the victorious principles by recalling that these same representative figures of liberal intellectual life had urged that Washington's wars must be waged mercilessly, with military support for ``Latin-style fascists,...regardless of how many are murdered,'' because ``there are higher American priorities than Salvadoran human rights.'' Elaborating, editor Michael Kinsley, who represented ``the left'' in mainstream commentary and television debate, cautioned against unthinking criticism of Washington's official policy of attacking undefended civilian targets. Such international terrorist operations cause ``vast civilian suffering,'' he acknowledged, but they may be ``perfectly legitimate'' if ``cost-benefit analysis'' shows that ``the amount of blood and misery that will be poured in'' yields ``democracy,'' as the world rulers define it. Enlightened opinion insists that terror is not a value in itself, but must meet the pragmatic criterion. "
http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/articles/z9709-davie-1.html