|
От
|
Alexandre Putt
|
|
К
|
Мигель
|
|
Дата
|
21.02.2007 16:03:45
|
|
Рубрики
|
Тексты;
|
|
Ваш упор на дедукцию Вас подводит (*)
Мальтус это понимал, а вот Вы - нет.
Вы используете дедукцию, не не способны видеть за рамками стройных логических моделей (случай ляпов в самих моделях я не комментирую).
А Ваши оппоненты, как идейные преемники Мальтуса, смотрят широко за пределы моделей и видят, где эти модели начинают завираться.
Это хорошо видно по дискуссии об очередях. Вы ни одного (!) аргумента оппонентов не поняли, да и не стремились.
Однако научный процесс не так должен быть поставлен. Вот пишет Tool (1999, p. 29) о методе экономикс:
Rationalism, as here used, is the view that knowledge can be derived via deduction from a priori assumptions or postulates. Rationalism consists mainly of deductive inference--the logical extraction or distillation of particulars from general propositions. Assuming a utility maximization principle... one can deduce principles of effective demand, substitutability of goods for each other, a market price system, and the like.
(Однако, (p.30))
These assumptions--utility maximization, profit motive, private property, competition--were taken as given. They were not the object or product of inquiry.
(Критика (p.30))
Orthodox deductivistic inquiry is episodic rather than processional or evolutionary. The inquiry episode has a beginning--taking premises as given. The episode has a middle--drawing of inferences. The episode has an ending--application of experience and (with luck) prediction of outcomes. Inquiry affirms that with which inquiry began--its assumptions... Logically elegant, it has no awkward facets and no ungainly handles; it is discrete; it sets no questions for further inquiry. In contrast, modern inquiry is processional, not episodic.
(Основная проблема)
Orthodoxy, in design, is positivistic. It addresses what is, not what ought to be... inquiry cannot be purposive and positivistic. To conceive a problem is to perceive a difference between is and ought, that is, to apply value theory embodying normative principles.
(О нормативности)
Orthodoxy, in application, is normative, the protests of its advocates to the contrary notwithstanding.
Tool, M. (1999). The Discretionary Economy.