|
|
От
|
Alexandre Putt
|
|
|
К
|
Oранжевый Глюк
|
|
|
Дата
|
21.07.2005 01:48:43
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Теоремы, доктрины;
|
|
А вот комментарии еще двух слушателей: Кейнса и Самуэльсона
Кейнс о сочинениях Маркса:
“turbid rubbish of the Red book stores”
“bible, above and beyond criticism, an obsolete textbook which I know to be not only scientifically erroneous but without interest or application for the modern world”
И в дополнение – Самуэльсона об адекватности марксизма реалиям:
"Specifically, was Marx right as a prophet of the future of Victorian capitalism? The immiserization of the working class, which he thought to deduce from the labor theory of value and his innovational concept of surplus value, simply never took place. As a prophet Marx was collosally unlucky and his system collosally useless when it comes to this key matter."
"Had Lange been writing in 1937, after Keynes, he might have added to the 1935 sentence “Marxian economics would be a poor basis for running a central bank or anticipating the effects of a change in the rate of discount” the sentence, “and it would be a poor basis for understanding the role of fiscal policy in maintaining high employment.” What admissions! This is equivalent to saying, “Marxian economics is powerless to explain the 1937-67 developments of European and American economies.”"
"To prove the Marxian pudding, only read the Soviet textbooks dealing with American and Western economic systems. Aesthetics aside, their predictive powers have been unbelievably erratic and perhaps only to be understood in terms of the dictum: Marxism has been the opiate of the Marxians."