От Alexusid
К All
Дата 19.06.2002 19:27:19
Рубрики WWII; Политек;

Вот какой пост интересный... т.е. мнение

Всем Б.Пр.


А взял тут:
http://www.slavonic.iptelecom.net.ua/forum/forumr.php



ABTOP= Александр Лузан HA= У вас как всегда путаница с фактами. (официальній документ об объявлении войны Германии)


TEKCT= 629. Телеграмма полномочного представителя СССР в Великобритании И. М. Майского в Народный комиссариат иностранных дел СССР
3 сентября 1939 г.
Для передачи Советскому правительству мной получены сегодня следующие официальные уведомления:
1. О том, что с 11 час. утра 3 сентября Англия находится в состоянии войны с Германией.
2. О том, что Англия и Франция будут всемерно избегать бомбардировок мирного населения и разрушения исторических памятников, а также соблюдать протокол 1936 г. о подводной войне, Женевский протокол 1925 г. о запрещении газовой войны и в воздушной борьбе с торговыми судами применять правила, регулирующие осуществление прав воюющей стороны военными судами,— все это, разумеется, при условии, что Германия будет вести себя таким же образом.
3. О том, что ввиду войны с Германией и в соответствии со ст. 24 англо-советского морского договора 1937 г. * король считает себя свободным от всех обязательств названного договора (ограничение вооружений и обмен информацией).
4. О минных полях в определенных районах (сообщено вам клером).
Полпред
АВП СССР, ф 05^, оп. 1, и 300, д 2078, т 26

Так кто на кого напал. Получается, что вторую мировую войну начал Чемберлен. А Гитлер хотел всего лишь защитить судетских немцев. Так кто агрессор.
Тем более у меня есть мирные предложения Германии Польше. Весьма конструктивные. Но англичане, будучи посредниками на переговорах с Гитлером, сорвали этот переговорный процесс.
Так кто виноват? Это никакие не шутки. Вторую мировую войну начал Чемберлен. Гитлер же хотел решить проблему мирным путем не смотря на польские погромы судетских немцев.
Посетите сайт автора сообщения



С ув. прощевайте.

От Alexusid
К Alexusid (19.06.2002 19:27:19)
Дата 20.06.2002 10:48:27

как бы в продолжение

Всем Б.Пр.
ABTOP= Александр Лузан TEMA= О не состоявшемся пакте Вильсона-Риббентропа по совместним действиям Англии и Германии по захвату Украины и о той роли, которая отводилась при этом украинским националистам.


TEKCT=
66. Телеграмма полномочного представителя СССР в Великобритании И. М. Майского в Народный комиссариат иностранных дел СССР
30 ноября 1938 г.
Из разговора с Вильсоном (советник Чемберлсна), который был у меня на завтраке, отмечу следующее:
1. Англии в ближайшем будущем не угрожает война, ибо, по мнению Вильсона, следующий большой удар Гитлера будет против Украины. Техника будет примерно та же, что и в случае с Чехословакией. Сначала рост национализма, вспышки, восстания украинского населения, а затем «освобождение» Украины Гитлером под лозунгом «самоопределения». Я, конечно, высмеял эту концепцию, но из разговора Вильсона мне всетаки стало ясно, что политика британского правительства в настоящее время в сильнейшей степени строится на ожидании германской экспансии на восток. Аналогичные мысли я слышал также из уст Уинтертона, Хора и других. Весьма вероятно, что если не весь кабинет в целом, то, по крайней мере, отдельные члены британского правительства поощряют Гитлера в сторону «восточной экспансии».
2. Вильсон утверждает, что в результате еврейских погромов и пр. вопрос о передаче Германии каких-либо колоний совершенно отпал, и притом на долгое время. Из доминионов и различных британских колоний сыплются сотни писем и телеграмм с протестами против «колониальной сделки» с Германией. Общественное мнение в самой Англии сильно возбуждено. Правительство, которое рискнуло бы поставить сейчас вопрос о возвращении Германии колоний, не удержалось бы у власти и двух недель. Впрочем, в заключение Вильсон несколько подозрительно прибавил, что «общественное настроение» подвержено изменению и что многое в окончательном решении вопроса о колониях будет зависеть от Франции.
3. По словам Вильсона, число германских самолетов первой линии в настоящее время достигает примерно 3500.
4. В области воздушной политики Англия, заявил Вильсон, отказалась от принципа «паритета» с Германией и стремится лишь к тому, чтобы предохранить себя от возможности серьезных бомбардировок с воздуха. «Паритет» излишен будто бы потому, что Германия, которой приходится всегда учитывать опасность со стороны СССР, ни при каких условиях не смогла бы бросить против Англии все свои воздушные силы.
Полпред
АВП СССР, ф 059, оп 1, п 278, д 1931, л 188—189 Опубл в изд Документы внешней политики СССР Т 21 С 658

121

И что же требовалось для осуществления этих планов, о которых так болтала Англия.
1. Создать Советско-Германскую границу, и следовательно как-то ликвидировать такой буфер, как Польша, которая находилась между и не позволяла такую границу создать.
2. Создать пятую колонну из украинских националистов для организации этих восстаний и провозглашения независимости подобно тому, как были созданы пятые колонны в Испании и Чехословакии.



С ув. прощевайте.

От Exeter
К Alexusid (19.06.2002 19:27:19)
Дата 19.06.2002 23:15:59

Давно хорошо известно...

...Что это именно Англия в 1939 г напала на Германию, а не наоборот!! :-))))

Коварство злобного Альбиона было разоблачено мировой прогрессивной общественностью уже тогда:

"...Великобритания в течение многих веков преследовала цель сделать народы Европы беззащитными против британской политики мирового господства..., всегда оставляла за собой право под ничтожным предлогом нападать на то европейское государство, которое в тот или иной момент было наиболее опасным...
Мы сами были свидетелями политики блокады, которую Великобритания проводила по отношению к Германии начиная с довоенных времен... Британские подстрекатели... подавили немецкий народ Версальским диктатом..."

"Воззвание к немецкому народу" Фюрера Великой германской нации 03.09.1939.

С уважением, Exeter

От CANIS AUREUS
К Exeter (19.06.2002 23:15:59)
Дата 20.06.2002 10:50:14

Re: И даже очень хорошо. разоблачение английских агрессоров

England's Guilt

by Joseph Goebbels


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is a major error to assume that England's plutocrats slipped into the war against their will or even against their intentions. The opposite is true. The English warmongers wanted the war and used all the resources at their disposal over the years to bring it about. They surely were not surprised by the war. English plutocracy had no goal other than to unleash war against Germany at the right moment, and this since Germany first began to seek once again to be a world power.

Poland really had little to do with the outbreak of war between the Reich and England. It was only a means to an end. England did not support the Polish government out of principle or for humanitarian reasons. That is clear from the fact that England gave Poland no help of any kind whatsoever when the war began. Nor did England take any measures against Russia. The opposite, in fact. The London warring clique to this day has tried to bring Russia into the campaign of aggression against Germany.

The encirclement of Germany long before the outbreak of the war was traditional English policy. From the beginning, England has always directed its main military might against Germany. It never could tolerate a strong Reich on the Continent. It justified its policy by claiming that it wanted to maintain a balance of forces in Europe.

Today there is still another reason. The English warmongers conceal it. It is crassly egotistic. The English prime minister announced the day the war began that England's goal was to destroy Hitlerism. However, he defined Hitlerism in a way other than how the English plutocracy actually sees it. The English warmongers claim that National Socialism wants to conquer the world. No nation is secure against German aggression. An end must be made of the German hunger for power. The limit came in the conflict with Poland. In reality, however, there is another reason for England's war with Germany. The English warmongers cannot seriously claim that Germany wants to conquer the world, particularly in view of the fact that England controls nearly two thirds of the world. And Germany since 1933 has never threatened English interests.

So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn in the eye of English plutocracy.

England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people's state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of this wealth. We see in England an army of millions of impoverished, socially enslaved and oppressed people. Child labor is still a matter of course there. They have only heard about social welfare programs. Parliament occasionally discusses social legislation. Nowhere else is there such terrible and horrifying inequality as in the English slums. Those with good breeding take no notice of it. Should anyone speak of it in public, the press, which serves plutocratic democracy, quickly brands him the worst kind of rascal. They do not hesitate from making major changes in the Constitution if they are necessary to preserve capitalist democracy.

Capitalism democracy suffers from every possible modern social ailment. The Lords and City people can remain the richest people one earth only because they constantly maintain their wealth by exploiting their colonies and preserving unbelievable poverty in their own country.

Germany, on the other hand, has based its domestic policies on new and modern social principles. That is why it is a danger to English plutocracy. It is also why English capitalists want to destroy Hitlerism. They see Hitlerism as all the generous social reforms that have occurred in Germany since 1933. The English plutocrats rightly fear that good things are contagious, that they could endanger English capitalism.

That is why England declared war on Germany. Since it was accustomed to letting others fight its wars, it looked to the European continent to find those ready to fight for England's interests. France was ready to take on this degrading duty, since the same kind of people ruled France. They too were ready for war out of egotistic reasons. Western European democracy is really only a Western European plutocracy that rules the world. It declared war on German socialism because it endangered their capitalist interests.

A similar drama began in 1914. England had more luck during those four and a half years than it is having today. Europe's nations had no chance to see what was happening. The nations of Europe today have no desire to play the same role they played during the World War. England and France stand alone. Still, England is trying once again to wage war without making any personal sacrifice. The goal is to blockade Germany, to gradually bring it to submit by starvation. That is longstanding English policy. They used it successfully in the Napoleonic wars, and also during the World War. It would work now as well, if the German people had not been educated by National Socialism. National Socialism is immune to English temptations. English propaganda lies no longer work in Germany. They have gradually lost their effectiveness in the rest of the world as well, since German propaganda today reaches far beyond its borders. This time, English plutocracy will not succeed in driving a wedge between the German people and their leadership, though that is their goal.

The German nation today is defending not only its honor and independence, but also the great social accomplishments it has made through hard and untiring work since 1933. It is a people's state built on the foundation of justice and economic good sense. In the past, England always had the advantage of facing a fragmented Germany. It is only natural that English plutocracy today seeks to split the German people and make it ripe for new collapse.

English lying propaganda can no longer name things by their proper names. It therefore claims that it is not fighting the German people, only Hitlerism. But we know this old song. In South Africa, England was not fighting the Boers, only Krugerism. In the World War, England wanted to destroy Kaiserism, not the German people. But that did not stop English plutocracy from brutally and relentlessly suppressing the Boers after that war or the Germans after our defeat.

A child once burned is twice shy. The German people were once victims of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind all English plutocratic capitalism's fine words, its aim is to destroy Germany's social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact on the German people.

English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers and soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at their disposal.

We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have to pay for it.

The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the capitalist methods of the 19th Century. The peoples have matured. They will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are the cause of their misery.

It is no accident that National Socialism has the historical task of carrying out this reckoning. Plutocracy is collapsing intellectually, spiritually, and in the not too distant future, militarily. We are acting consistently with Nietzsche's words: "Give a shove to what is falling."





От Kadet
К CANIS AUREUS (20.06.2002 10:50:14)
Дата 20.06.2002 10:57:17

Класс :-)))

Особенно нравится формулировка про обьединенный фронт немецких рабочих, крестьян и солдат.

От Алексей
К Alexusid (19.06.2002 19:27:19)
Дата 19.06.2002 20:36:22

Re: В развитие темы ...


>Всем Б.Пр.

Добрый день,


>А взял тут:
>
http://www.slavonic.iptelecom.net.ua/forum/forumr.php

Интересно, хотя важен сам оригинал документа. Нет лт его у вас ?

В развиьтие темы: - не попадались ли вам документы из архива Иностранных дел Польши, захваченные по случаю войсками Германии про взяти Варшавы и подготовленные к печати ведомством Геббельса. Очень интересные, но вот найти - трудненько!!

Не попадались в сети или в публикации на бумаге (фотографии, сканкопии - accepted)

Спасибо.





>ABTOP= Александр Лузан HA= У вас как всегда путаница с фактами. (официальній документ об объявлении войны Германии)


>TEKCT= 629. Телеграмма полномочного представителя СССР в Великобритании И. М. Майского в Народный комиссариат иностранных дел СССР
>3 сентября 1939 г.
>Для передачи Советскому правительству мной получены сегодня следующие официальные уведомления:
>1. О том, что с 11 час. утра 3 сентября Англия находится в состоянии войны с Германией.
>2. О том, что Англия и Франция будут всемерно избегать бомбардировок мирного населения и разрушения исторических памятников, а также соблюдать протокол 1936 г. о подводной войне, Женевский протокол 1925 г. о запрещении газовой войны и в воздушной борьбе с торговыми судами применять правила, регулирующие осуществление прав воюющей стороны военными судами,— все это, разумеется, при условии, что Германия будет вести себя таким же образом.
>3. О том, что ввиду войны с Германией и в соответствии со ст. 24 англо-советского морского договора 1937 г. * король считает себя свободным от всех обязательств названного договора (ограничение вооружений и обмен информацией).
>4. О минных полях в определенных районах (сообщено вам клером).
>Полпред
>АВП СССР, ф 05^, оп. 1, и 300, д 2078, т 26

>Так кто на кого напал. Получается, что вторую мировую войну начал Чемберлен. А Гитлер хотел всего лишь защитить судетских немцев. Так кто агрессор.
>Тем более у меня есть мирные предложения Германии Польше. Весьма конструктивные. Но англичане, будучи посредниками на переговорах с Гитлером, сорвали этот переговорный процесс.
>Так кто виноват? Это никакие не шутки. Вторую мировую войну начал Чемберлен. Гитлер же хотел решить проблему мирным путем не смотря на польские погромы судетских немцев.
>Посетите сайт автора сообщения



>С ув. прощевайте.

От CANIS AUREUS
К Алексей (19.06.2002 20:36:22)
Дата 20.06.2002 11:22:27

Re: Ваши материалы, разоблачающие польских агоессоров. Конспект, так сказать

The New Year 1939/40

by Joseph Goebbels


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is harder for me than it was in years past to recall the old year for my listeners. Certainly there is no lack of material. To the contrary, the year 1939 was so dramatic and filled with historical splendors that one could fill a library writing about them. One hardly knows where to begin.

Much that happened in the past year already seems as if it happened years or even decades ago. It was a year burned into the book of history. It will surely give the historians enough material to write about for decades to come. They will explain the events and look into the motives and drives of the central characters. They will attempt to explain critically all that moves us so deeply, all that we have done, and they will probably fall short in the attempt. Whether friend or foe, supporter or opponent, all will have to admit that this was a great and eventful year, a year in which history was made, in which the face of Europe changed, in which the map took new form. More than that, our people began to restore its national life in 1939, beginning a great effort finally to throw off the chains of constraint and slavery and to once again take our place as a great power after our deep fall [after 1918]. When the diligent historians investigate this year, the worries and difficulties we all had will be forgotten; the sacrifices will appear in a milder and more becoming light, the tears shed will be concealed and the blood that has been shed will be the cement that forever holds our Reich together.

From the beginning, it was clear for everyone who can not only read history, but can experience it, that this year would deeply affect the fate of Germany and the European peoples. True, the first two months were relatively uneventful, but he who saw clearly knew it was only the calm before the storm. Everyone felt that it would be a year of important decisions.

On 13 February the ethnic Germans in Bohemia and Moravia made it clear that their legal, economic and social situation in the former Czechoslovakia had not become better since the solution of the Sudeten problem, but had in fact worsened. On 22 February, the Slovakians called for independence. At the beginning of March there were severe persecutions of Germans in Prague, Brünn and other cities in Bohemia and Moravia. On 8 March the Carpathian-Ukranian government in Prague protested against the appointment of a Czech general as Carpathian-Ukrainian interior minister. On 10 March, the Czech government deposed the Slovakian government and the persecution of Germans in Bohemia and Moravia intensified. It was clear that the time had come to settle the problems in these areas, which had been cultivated by Germans for centuries. On 13 March, the Slovakian leader Tiso visited the Führer, and on 14 March the Czech President Dr. Hache placed the fate of Bohemia and Moravia in the hands of the Führer.

The goddess of history looked down to earth. German troops entered Bohemia and Moravia, and with breathless excitement the German people and the whole world saw the Führer take up residence in the castle of Prague. Slovakia declared independence on the same day, and the day after the Führer issued his historical decree establishing the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. The Slovakians put themselves under the protection of the Reich. The issue of Bohemia and Moravia found its final historic solution. On 22 March, the Memel District returned to the Reich.

Parallel to these developments, the Polish question was intensifying. As early as 5 January, the Führer received the Polish Foreign Minister Beck at the Obersalzberg. He reminded him of Danzig's German character and made suggestions for improving German-Polish relations. These proposals fell on deaf Polish ears. After the reactions from London and Paris to these developments, one knew why.

On 31 March, soon after the establishment of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, London hate papers printed lies about German troops gathering on the Polish border. Chamberlain reported to the House of Commons on English-Polish negotiations, and gave a formal declaration of British support to Poland.

The London warmongering clique thus gave Warsaw the freedom to act, in the secret wish that Warsaw would begin the conflict that the London plutocrats needed in order to begin their long desired and carefully prepared military measures against the Reich.

The government in Warsaw understood. Beginning in April, the terror and persecution of ethnic Germans climbed beyond the previous normal and tolerable level. On 13 April, severe anti-German persecutions occurred on the Danzig border. The terrorist attacks on Germans rose throughout Poland after Germany began its efforts to improve relations. German consulates reported countless persecutions every day to Berlin. On 8 May, 300 ethnic Germans were expelled from Neutomischel County. The German theater was closed in Bromberg on 9 May. Two Germans were killed by Poles in Lodsch on 15 May. A Danzig citizen was killed by Poles in Kalthof on 21 May.

One can understand this only after learning that on 15 May the Polish War Minister Kasprzycki was in Paris for secret talks, and that the German representative in Warsaw reported to Berlin on 8 May that maps were being distributed in Polish cities that showed the border moved into German territory past Beuthen, Oppeln, Gleiwitz, Breslau, Stettin and Kolberg.

The situation in Danzig intensified under Polish pressure. On 15 June, the German ambassador lodged an official protest against insults and slanders against the Führer. Border incidents and other problems increased through June and July. On 4 August, the Polish government made an insolent and provocative ultimatum against rumors of alleged resistance against Polish customs officials. Danzig rejected the ultimatum on 7 August. The German government expressed its concern the Polish representative on 9 August. Poland apparently felt itself under England's protection, and gave an unsatisfactory reply on 10 August. On 18 August, the SS Home Defense was mobilized to protect the German city of Danzig. Things were in motion.

English plutocracy attempted to wash its hands of the situation and claim innocence, attempting to build a moral alibi for the war it wanted. But even a blind man could see what England was doing.

On 24 August, the customs negotiations between Danzig and Poland ended because of Polish intransigence. Poland called up further reserves and intensified its provocations. On 25 August Poland further intensified the situation by firing on a German plane with a Reich Secretary on board on international airspace.

The reaction of the London warmongering clique to the events they had encouraged was clear; on 25 August they demonstratively signed a British-Polish alliance. The day after, a million and a half Poles were under arms.

The Führer spoke to the German Reichstag on 27 August. He announced that he wanted to solve three problems: that of Danzig, of the Corridor, and that of improving Germany's relations to Poland in a way that would guarantee peaceful cooperation.

Lively diplomatic efforts between Berlin, Rome, London and Paris occurred between 28 and 31 August. The Führer yet again attempted a peaceful solution by announcing that the German government was expecting a Polish emissary. Poland replied by provocatively announcing general mobilization on 30 August. Polish radio on 31 August declared German proposals to solve the existing problems unacceptable. German consulates reported 55 instances between 25 and 31 August of the most serious Polish attacks on ethnic Germans. Polish troops committed a series of serious border violations on 31 August.

The result was that German troops marched into Poland on 1 September. The Führer spoke to the Reichstag and announced that force would be met with force. The same day, Danzig proclaimed its union with the Reich.

The following lightening campaign in Poland was unique in all of history. On 2 September, the Jablunka Pass was taken. The Polish army in the Corridor was destroyed on 4 August. Bromberg was captured on 6 September. The Westernplatte fell on 7 September. Lodsch was captured on 10 September. The encirclement of Radom was completed on 12 September. 52,000 Poles laid down their weapons. Posen, Thorn, Gnesen and Hohensalza were captured on 13 September. Gdingen fell into German hands on 15 September. Brest-Litovsk fell on 17 September. The encirclement of Weichselbogen um Kunto was completed successfully on 18 September. 170,000 Polish prisoners marched into captivity. Warsaw capitulated on 27 September. Modlin fell two days later. The Polish army was defeated and destroyed.

Over 700,000 Poles were captured. The booty was enormous. Over a half million guns, 16,000 machine guns, 32,000 artillery pieces and over 3 3/4 million rounds of artillery munitions fell into our hands.

The London warmongering clique did not lift a finger to support its Polish ally. England saw the solution of the German-Polish problem only as an excuse to begin the long-desired battle with the German people.

The English warmongers had achieved their first goal. Ever since the Munich Agreement, London had more and more been winning the upper hand. They increasingly influenced the governments in London and Paris. The year 1939 was increasingly characterized by Germany's encirclement. London plutocracy used the extremely tense situation to prepare war against Germany. Chamberlain and Halifax were in Paris on 10 January. Chamberlain told the House of Commons on 5 February that the full forces of the Empire were ready to assist France. On 18 March, Britain and France protested the establishment of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. War was avoided only because France and England were not ready for it. But as the Protectorate was established, the anti-German press campaign in London and Paris reached its first peak.

At the same time, the London warmongering clique spread alarming rumors to conceal the true situation. A lying report on 19 March claimed that Germany had given Romania an ultimatum. The Norwegian Foreign Minister denied reports from Paris about alleged German threats against the Nordic states on 21 March. On 24 March, England guaranteed the security of Holland, Belgium, Switzerland and the Eastern states. Not a day passed in which the English press did not predict some sort of German attack or spread lies about German threats against the smaller states.

Paris played the same tune. The French government passed emergency measures to strengthen the navy on 28 March. The English Chief of Staff Gort visited France.

The English-French warmongering clique now made a desperate attempt to bring Russia into the alliance against Germany. The English Commerce Minister Hudson traveled to Moscow on 28 March. London newspapers printed lies on 31 March that German troops were gathering on the Polish border. The same day, Chamberlain told the House of Commons that England would stand by Poland and Romania.

The Führer on the following day warned the English encirclers in a speech at Wilhelmshaven. On 5 April, Lord Stanhope said that the air forces of the English fleet were on alert. London established a munitions ministry on 20 April, in case of necessity. The Führer replied to these warmongering actions on the part of English plutocracy in a speech to the German Reichstag on 28 April. He declared the provisions of the German-English naval accord null and void, and also the German-Polish agreement of 1934.

A day before, England had introduced the draft, and negotiations between England, France and Russia began on 14 June in Moscow. London's goal was to organize an attack on Germany from both East and West.

At the same time, English propaganda made the foolish attempt to confuse the German people by leaflets, radio and the press, the same thing they had so often done in the past. The plans failed. The German people stood firmly and unanimously behind the Führer. The English attempt to bring Russia into its encirclement campaign collapsed.

The British Ambassador returned from London to Berlin on 25 August. The Führer presented him with a generous proposal for a lasting understanding between Germany and England. The English government did not intend to respond to this constructive proposal. Their answer came on 28 August. England claimed that it had received assurances from the Polish government that it would negotiate with the Reich government. The Führer replied to the English government on 29 August that the Reich government was ready to accept the English proposal and expected the Polish negotiator on Wednesday, 30 August. On the evening of 30 August and despite the absence of the Polish delegate, the Reich Foreign Minister gave the English Ambassador in Berlin a sixteen point proposal to resolve the questions of Danzig, the Corridor, and German-Polish minority issues.

Poland replied with force, and the Führer had no alternative but to answer force with force.

Paris and London demanded the withdrawal of German troops from Poland on 1 September. The German Reich government rejected the demand. Mussolini's attempts to resolve the situation on 2 September collapsed because of England's stance. On 3 September, London and Paris gave Germany an ultimatum, and declared war against the Reich soon after.

Now the mask fell from the faces of the London warmongering clique. When the government was shuffled on 3 September, the leading members of the warmongering clique joined the cabinet. Churchill and Eden became official inciters of British war policy.

The war of the Western powers against the Reich had begun. The Führer's foreign policy had succeeded in destroying Britain's campaign of encirclement. England and France were alone against Germany.

The Reich faced a new challenge. All necessary internal measures had been taken to ensure a victorious conclusion to the war. On 28 August, rationing of food and consumer items was introduced. A Ministry for Defense was established on 30 August. Comprehensive economic measures were announced on 1 September, and a Reich Defense Commission with extensive powers was established on 5 September. Measures to guarantee the necessities of life for dependents of soldiers were implemented on 20 October. As early as 6 November, we could increase food rations. On 16 November, clothing rationing was introduced, and on 20 November better rations for those working at night or in demanding occupations.

The Front and the Homeland celebrated Christmas as a firm and unshakable community. The Führer was with his troops at the West Wall to celebrate Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. The year 1939 ended with the German people holding to an unshakable confidence in victory.

Another year is behind us, the proudest and most important year of the National Socialist regime. We see its passing with honor and respect. It was a German year in Europe's history. We honor the sacrifices that the entire German people have made in this year. Some were affected more than others. We have done all we could to see that the burdens are fairly shared. This war involves the whole people. It is a war for our national existence. It has not yet seen its full extent on every front. No one can doubt that the warmongering cliques in London and Paris want to stifle Germany, to destroy the German people. They grant that openly today. They reserve their sanctimonious phrases about defeating Hitlerism, but not the German people, only for the stupid. We know what they are doing from experience, and a child once burned is more cautious the second time. No one in Germany listens to them. They want to attack the Führer through Hitlerism, the Reich through Hitlerism, and the German people through the Reich. All the Führer's attempts at peace bore no fruit with them. We 90 million in the Reich stand in the way of their brutal plans for world domination. They hate our people because it is decent, brave, industrious, hardworking and intelligent. They hate our views, our social policies, and our accomplishments. They hate us as a Reich and as a community. They have forced us into a struggle for life and death. We will defend ourselves accordingly. All is clear between us and our enemies. All Germans know what we are doing, and the entire German people is filled with fanatical resolve. There is no comparison here to the World War. Germany today is economically, politically, militarily and spiritually ready to respond to the attack of the enemy.

It would be a mistake to predict what will happen in the New Year. That all is in the future. One thing is clear: It will be a hard year, and we must be ready for it. Victory will not fall into our laps. We must earn it, and not only at the front, but at home as well. Everyone has to work and fight for it.

Therefore in this hour as we bid farewell to a great year and enter a new one, the homeland greets the front. We greet soldiers in bunkers and the front lines, at airbases and in the navy. The homeland and the front join in a common greeting to the Führer. May a gracious fate keep him healthy and strong; then we will look with assurance into the future. Today more than ever he is Germany, the faith of our people, and the certainty of its future. We bow in honor before the great sacrifices of our people. The sacrifices of the past and those yet to come must not be in vain. We owe that to the Reich and its future.

As we raise our hearts in grateful thanks to the Almighty, we ask his gracious protection in the coming year. We do not want to make it difficult for him to give us his blessing. We want to work and fight, and say with that Prussian General: "Lord, if you cannot help us or choose not to, we ask at least that you do not help our damned enemies!"





От Alexusid
К Алексей (19.06.2002 20:36:22)
Дата 20.06.2002 10:37:26

Гм-м... ну могу поспрашать...(+)

Сложно что-то обещать.
Возможно у того же А.Лузана в архивах и есть чего-нибудь...

С ув. тёзка.

От Вадим Жилин
К Alexusid (19.06.2002 19:27:19)
Дата 19.06.2002 19:32:03

Re: Вот какой...

Приветствую.

Более того, амеры привели гитлера к власти, а брины их шестерки.

С Уважением, Вадим
http://220641.nm.ru

От Kadet
К Вадим Жилин (19.06.2002 19:32:03)
Дата 19.06.2002 21:30:43

Резунизм...


>Приветствую.

>Более того, амеры привели гитлера к власти, а брины их шестерки.

>С Уважением, Вадим
http://220641.nm.ru

Ага, и по непонятным причинам вступили войну с армиейбольше Португальской но меньше Болгарской...