|
От
|
Василий Фофанов
|
|
К
|
Леонид
|
|
Дата
|
25.07.2003 22:03:58
|
|
Рубрики
|
Танки;
|
|
Лучше разумеется
Никакой пурги про "мы такую броню вам сварим что при той же толщине будет круче КВ", напротив, при чтении отчета очевидно, что по мнению американских специалистов броня была весьма приличной, хорошего химического состава, хотя образцы показали переменное качество (ну дык в 42-то году!).
Да что там, судите сами если знаете язык:
"The armor components of the Medium Tank T-34 were heat treated to very high
hardness levels (429-495 Brinell) probably in a attempt to obtain maximum
resistance to penetration even at the expense of structural stability under
ballistic attack."
"The elongation and reduction of area (Note: a way to measure ductility) of
the rolled and cast armour sections compare favorably with the same
properties of domestic good quality steel at comparably high tensile
strengths."
"The quality of the rolled steel armor components covers the entire range from poor to excellent, indicating wide variations in production technique.
Several of the plates were incompletely quench hardened although possesing
hardenability adequate to quench harden through the section thickness."
"The silicon conten of the Mn-Si-Ni-Cr-Mo (Note: in T-34 glacis and KWI 5 inch plates) and Mn-Si-Mo steels is high, ranging from 1.0 -1.5% Si. All the
compositions provide hardenability adequate for satisfactory quench hardening of the sections."
С уважением, Василий Фофанов http://armor.kiev.ua/fofanov