>>Тут опять спор случится об том какой хрен чьей редьки слаще. Наряду с "Нахтигалем" ещё были и "Смерчи" разные - братья близнецы по роду занятий.
>Насчет "Смерчей" расскажите подробней, интересно.
Comparative Analysis of Armed Resistance for Independence in the Baltic Countries and Ukraine
S u m m a r y
The struggle of Western Ukraine for the independent State of Ukraine against Poland, the Soviet Union and Germany goes back to 1918. The movement for the restoration of independence in Baltic countries after the Soviet occupation in 1940 grew into armed resistance in 1941. The geopolitical situation in 1940– 1941, postured the Soviet Union as the worst enemy of the independence movements in the Baltic countries. The non-aggression and lingering strategy was practised with respect to German occupation. Whereas the Soviet occupation policy was opposed by armed resistance as well as other means. The armed resistance movements in the Baltic Countries and Western Ukraine in 1944–1953 became major determinants for the future historical events.
Studies of armed resistance in other Soviet-held territories, their respective scale and intensity, can be compared with the scale and intensity of armed resistance in Lithuania and Western Ukraine. For instance in 1947 the scope of the movement in Lithuania was 9–15 times intense than in Latvia in, battles with MVD–MGB forces and sustained casualties on both sides. The movement in Estonia accordingly was 3–4 times smaller than in Latvia. Anti Soviet movements in the struggle against totalitarian regimes both in Baltic Countries and Ukraine were based on the support of their populations inherent national values and the quest for independence. It was the first strong blow to communist regime and armed response to genocide policy.
http://www.genocid.lt/Leidyba/5/Nijole.htm Nijolė Gaškaitė-Žemaitienė
The Strategies of the Movement for the Liberation of Lithuania
S u m m a r y
In 1944 the underground organisations of Lithuania agreed to exercise the following tactics for the restitution of Lithuania’s independence:
1) to employ various diplomatic instruments provided that the Soviet Union, complying with the Atlantic Charter, retreated from occupied territories;
2) to organise a general uprising in case of an armed conflict of the Soviet Union with Western countries.
Up to 1946 Lithuania hoped that an International Conference of Peace will restore the pre–war state borders. So one of the major tasks of partisan movement at that period was to continually remind the free countries of Lithuania’s subjugation and inform about Soviet terror in the country. After subjugation the Lithuanians boycotted elections organised by the Soviets and forcible mobilisation to the Red Army. They also made various hindrances against the foundation of public governmental bodies and the arrival of colonists.
At the onset of the Cold War between 1946 and 1948, and particularly after Winston Churchill’s speech in Fulham and the enunciation of the Truman Doctrine, Lithuania believed that Western countries would exercise a direct power against the Soviet Union. Following the communist coup d’etat in Czechoslovakia in 1948 and the isolation of Berlin’s eastern sector, it was assumed that the Soviet Union itself would start a war. Taking into consideration the international situation Lithuanian partisans tried to slow down the process of collectivisation and the destruction of farmsteads.
In 1949 an all partisan organisation called the Movement for the Liberation of Lithuania (LLKS) was formed. The movement was directed by the Supreme Council. The Council worked out a plan and tactics for the liberation of Lithuania. The LLKS, an international situation being favourable, was to organise a general uprising, to form provisional governmental bodies, to guard state borders and to represent Lithuania’s interests at international organisations. Since the Soviet occupation persisted the Council modified the tactics of the movement and engaged new forms of resistance. The movement focused its activities on ideological struggle. The LLKS decided to curtail military operations but the existing system of the partisan Staffs and communications were preserved. The number of underground publications during that period considerably increased. The partisan underground press that had well over 70 different publications existed until 1959 although the armed resistance had ceased some years before.
Могу перевести надписи на таблицах, согласен, что это нехорошо, что этих статей на русский не переводят. Сам выражал недовольство по этому поводу авторам сайта.
>>Одним словом Родину надо защищать от всех оккупантов без особой для этого дела сепарации и всеми имеющимися для этого пригодными легальными и нелегальными средствами...
>Не согласен. Определенные средства могут полностью дискредитировать цель. Что в случае с ОУН, кстати, и произошло IMHO.
Единственная оговорка - цели должны быть военные: военные объекты, гос.учреждения оккупационных властей, коммуникационная сеть и т.д.
На полном серьёзе, разговаривал как то с одним ирландцем, у них (он из Шин Фейн был) именно такая официальная тактика действий.
