|
|
От
|
Ibuki
|
|
|
К
|
Исаев Алексей
|
|
|
Дата
|
27.02.2012 15:48:17
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
WWII; Танки; Артиллерия;
|
|
Re: Про "зачем?"...
>Снаряд явно хорошо нормализуется. Т.е. для того, чтоюы бить в лоб самой растпространенной цели - Т-34(Т-70? СУ-76?) вполне подходит.
>Guns vs T-34/85:
>75mm M40 PaK40 firing AP, HVAP and HEAT
>M39 AP (PzGr.39?) penetrates glacis @ 1300m*
>M40 subcaliber (PzGr.40?) penetrates glacis @ 1200m*
>M40W** subcaliber (PzGr.40W?) fails to penetrate glacis.
>M38B HEAT (Hl.38/B?) penetrates glacis if side angle is less then 20deg.
>M39 AP penetrates upper side hull @ 1750m
>M40 subcalibre penetrates side hull at any efective range
>M40W subcaliber penetrates side hull @ 200m
>M38B HEAT penetrates side hull if side angle is less then 30 deg.
>All rounds penetrate lower side hull at any efective range.
>M39 AP penetrates front turret @ 1000m
>M40 subcaliber penetrates front turret @ 1250m
>M40W subcaliber fails t penetrate front turret
>M38B HEAT fails to penetrate front turret
>M39 AP penetrates side turret @ 1750m
>M40 subcaliber penetrates side turret at any efective range
>M40W subcaliber penetrates side turret @ 200m
>M38B HEAT penetrates side turret if side angle is less then 30deg
>*It apears that subcaliber (APCR/HVAP) suffered more from high hardness, largely sloped glacis...
>**That is a version of M40 subcaliber that had soft steel core. It was acording to the manuel to be used vs "fast, lightly armored targets"...
Судя по борту Т-34 и на ВЛД Т-70 должны быть проблемы.