|
|
От
|
lesnik
|
|
|
К
|
74omsbr
|
|
|
Дата
|
08.01.2011 21:03:05
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
WWII; Армия;
|
|
Нет
>>При этом бригады на Страйкерах - средняя пехота папуасов гонять.
>Бригады Страйкеров созданы не для этого. Их огневые возможности позволяют вести оборонительный бой с высокой эффективности против мотопехотных или танковых бригад любого противника.
Основная идея соединений на Страйкерах - переброска в любую точку мира
бригады за 96 часов, дивизии за 120 часов.
Подразделения на Страйкерах _могут_ противостоять механизированным частям противника, но это влечет неоправданно большие потери. В случае опасности столкновения с таким противником они полагаются на скорость и вызов поддержки :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stryker#Mission
The Stryker relies on its speed and communications for the majority of its defense against heavy weapon systems. It is not capable of engaging heavily armored units, relying on communication and other units to control threats outside of its classification. One variant is armed with anti-tank missiles.
However, at the National Training Center (Fort Irwin California) 3rd Brigade 2nd ID proved that, through the use of unconventional tactics and small dismounted teams armed with anti-armor weaponry, a Stryker unit could hold its own against a conventional armored unit, should the need arise. This situation is something that commanders would most likely avoid due to a higher casualty rate.
Brigades equipped with the Stryker are intended to be strategically mobile (i.e., capable of being rapidly deployed over long distances). As such, the Stryker was intentionally designed with a lower level of protection compared to tracked vehicles like the M2 Bradley, but with much lower logistic requirements.