|
|
От
|
FED-2
|
|
|
К
|
Chestnut
|
|
|
Дата
|
26.06.2008 20:12:52
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
Армия; 1917-1939;
|
|
Re: Она просто...
>>Извините, но это не совсем так. А вернее совсем не так. Ув. Цолдер совершенно правильно описал английский судебный процесс. Если Вы признаете себя виновным перед "престольным судом", никакой кассационный суд аппеляции на это от Вас не примет.
>
>А вот американская Юридическая Энциклопедия утверждает:
>A guilty plea that has subsequently been withdrawn and followed by a plea of not guilty cannot be used as an admission in either a criminal or civil case. It is considered an unreliable admission that has a potentially prejudicial effect on the opportunity of the defendant to get a fair trial.
> http://www.answers.com/topic/admission
Да, по американским законам я не особо специалист. Но если уж перебрасыватся цитатами, то вот, на скорую руку:
If you pled guilty, you may not be able to appeal your conviction, unless you try to withdraw your guilty plea under a special set of rules. But you can appeal your sentence, if the sentence is illegal or if it was higher than you and the prosecutor agreed to in a plea bargain, and the court agreed to the terms of the bargain before sentencing you. For a sentence to be illegal (which is rare), it has to be higher than that allowed by law.
http://criminal.lawyers.com/Criminal-Law--Appeals-FAQs.html .
А вот здесь о аппеляции против решений мировых судов в Англии:
A person who pleaded not-guilty may also appeal against his conviction. A person who has pleaded guilty may only appeal if his guilty plea was equivocal when made, if his guilty plea has subsequently shown to be equivocal, if he wishes to argue that he had already been acquitted or convicted of the same offence on another occasion, or where a reference is made by the Criminal Cases Review Commission.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenges_to_decisions_of_England_and_Wales_magistrates'_courts