>>Всё они могут - не говорите чепухи. Естественно непрямое указание, а сформировать ряд непрямых действий которые привели бы к выдаче зверька - Блэр мог легко. Но не сделал скотина
>
>Какие действия мог сформировать Блэр, не нарушая при этом принцип разделения властей?
"For the purposes of this Treaty, the following offenses shall not be considered political offenses: [...] murder [...] kidnaping [...] taking of a hostage [...] use of an explosive, incendiary, or destructive device [...] possession of an explosive, incendiary, or destructive device"
"if the competent authority [...] determines that the request was politically motivated [...] the executive branch is the competent authority" (принцип разделения властей?)
"Extradition shall not be precluded by the fact that the competent authorities [...] have decided not to prosecute the person sought for the acts for which extradition is requested [...] to discontinue any criminal proceedings [...] are still investigating the person" (просто замечательно!)
"The decision by the Requested State whether to grant the request for extradition shall be
made without regard to any statute of limitations in either State." (принцип "разделения властей" во всей красе)
"When the offense for which extradition is sought is punishable by death under the laws in the Requesting State and is not punishable by death under the laws in the Requested State, the executive authority in the Requested State may refuse extradition unless the Requesting State provides an assurance that the death penalty will not be imposed or, if imposed, will not be carried out." (опять "разделение властей", ну и, куда ж без него, gentlemen's agreement).
