|
|
От
|
jazzist
|
|
|
К
|
Skvortsov
|
|
|
Дата
|
26.05.2020 22:38:44
|
|
|
Рубрики
|
ВВС; 1917-1939;
|
|
Re: Можно уточнить...
>> - в те времена тонна веса одномоторного дюралевого истребителя по трудозатратам в массовом производстве выше, чем тонна веса многомоторного самолета (затраты примерно обратно пропорциональны кубическому корню веса).
>
>Какая единая формула описывала зависимость затрат от веса Me-109, Me-110, Ю-88 и ФВ-200?
я по-немецки читаю с большим трудом и ответить не могу. Могу сказать как англосаксы по обе стороны океана относились к делу. Они переводили выпуск в условные единицы одномоторных истребителей. Переводили по весу. Пример:
Calculation of Efficiency Index The steps taken to determine an index of relative efficiency between Japanese aircraft production and American aircraft production are briefly as follows:
(1) The pounds of weight produced is converted to a common basis (that of fighter production). It has been determined that the unit cost of an airplane or the production hours per airplane varies inversely as the weight to the one-third power.
Это тоже из ЮС Стратеджик Бомбин сёвея только не Европейский ТВД, а Тихоокеанский
United States Strategic Bombing Survey Reports
Pacific Theater
015 The Japanese Aricraft Industry
британский взгляд:
The simple production figures look impressive enough: 26,263 aircraft delivered in 1943 as against 2827 in 1938; 26,461 in 1944. The total output in 1939–45 amounted to 796,750,000 lb of structure weight. But comparison with Germany and the United States in terms of output per man-day, even though such a comparison can only be approximate, presents a less inspiring picture. Perhaps expectedly, but nonetheless ominously with regard to postwar market prospects for the aircraft industry, the United States far outstripped Britain in productivity, with a peak annual average of 2.76 lb of structure weight per man-day in 1944 compared with the British peak annual average of 1.19 lb in that year. But even Germany’s peak annual average productivity, at 1.5 lb per man-day in 1943, was a fifth better than Britain’s. Moreover, this German productive superiority constituted more of an achievement than the bare figures indicate. For whereas German production overwhelmingly concentrated on fighters, a large proportion of British output took the form of bombers, which required fewer man-hours per structure weight to produce. In the words of a calculation in the Air Ministry in 1940, ‘a ton of heavy aircraft represented less added value and a smaller industrial effort than a ton of lighter aircraft.’
Correlli Barnett "The Audit of War: The Illusion and Reality of Britain as a Great Nation"
жирным выделил я
ша-ба-да-ба-да фиА...